Pages
- About the Content
- About Us
- Costa Rica Property Law – Squatter’s vs. Landowner’s Rights
- RSS Costa Rica Real Estate
Categories
Archives
- July 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
Meta
Autor: rod
~ 19/03/08
by Rod Hughes
The Environmental Tribunal shut down three condominium projects yesterday because of damage to the habitat. They are the “Costa Montana” and “Hermosa Vista” condo projects near Jaco Beach as well as “Hills of Esterillos” at Parrita, totalling 360 dwellings in all.
According to the tribunal, an autonomous institution of the Environment Ministry, development of these projects resulted in leveled mountains, dead trees, drainage choked by sediment and danger to wetlands. “The case of the Parrita project is disagreeable, where they didn’t even have construction permits,” commented tribunal chief Jose Lino Chaves.
He added that Hills of Esterillos put up 36 houses where they had authorization for only six and had plans for another 64 units. In contrast, Costa Montana had all their municipal and environmental permits but proceeded to build in protected zones and on slopes of more than 60 degrees. In that project, the government shares the blame, however, in that SENTENA (an environmental watchdog agency, supposedly) issued the permit based upon the notion that the area was “pasture.”
Far from pasture, the zone is mountainous, covered with secondary forests and an important aquifer to supply water to nearby populations. This is the second case in a few months (see previous blog) in which the environmental watchdogs have proven blind, leading observers to wonder if inspections are ever made on prospective development sites before building begins. In this instance, the tribunal made eight on-site inspections, but only after the damage had been done to three. Only two were totally in harmony with nature.
Only 15 minutes from Jaco Beach, preparation of the Hermosa Vista project resulted in “destruction of the worst proportions, where a mountain was literally bulldozed to make way for terraces on which to build 100 homes,” the tribunal said.
As a visitor to Costa Rica, and one considering future retirement plans,
one cannot be surprised by these events. My most recent trip to the
Jaco area in January of 2008, left a large looming question in my mind
about the environmental sustainablity of the Pacific Coast line in particular,
as many areas have Condo Projects underway. In Jaco, there is currently
a lot of new construction started and even more awaiting starts. Even for
someone not trained in this field, its seems quite possible that these areas
experiencing such growth will most definately see some negative impact
on the environment. How can thousands of condo units be constructed
without any improvements to the Cities own infrastructure, roads, waste
management, waste disposal, drainage systems etc. Jaco alone is showing
it’s in need of serious clean up already, the beach areas are filthy, garbage
seems to be everywhere. There appears to be a mish mash of drainage
systems. Both rivers going through the city were polluted. If these cities
and towns expect to draw such high prices for real estate, then where is
the assurance that sufficient services are also taken into consideration.
Take a look at the situation recently in the coastal city of Tamarindo.
Resorts and Condo resort type projects are contaminating
the water supplies, ocean, and beaches. Who’s pockets are being
lined ?? Where is all the money for development going? Surely its not
spent on roads.
We travelers come to CR for the climate and the "Pura Vida" but it seems
that the Pure protion is questionable. Can the Pacific Coast endure this
amount of growth without serious harm to the envirnment?? Who’s really
watching???
Comment by clima — March 21, 2008 @ 7:42 pm
I agree 100%, I would also add that schools, hospitals, the electrical grid and many other public services must be added to support the increased population. The developers come in and make nice projects, but they don’t give anything back to the community in most cases. The foreigners living here don’t pay taxes, or pay very low taxes on the property.
It seems to me that in this case the money hasn’t gone missing, but that the government is allowing development without making sure the developers do their part to improve the infrastructure in the surrounding area.
At a minimum the government should charge enough to developers to pay for enough inspectors so that there is some kind of oversight going on. Also additional staff to make the approval process go faster.
I also agree that Costa Rica must maintain its image as a natural paradise. If the Pacific Coast ends up looking like South Beach or Cancun, why would anyone buy there? It is an important issue and I don’t think there is enough discussion in the local communities or planning from the government.
Clearly Costa Rica has always had something unique to offer and that is what makes it attractive for expats and investors. If this “pura vida” is lost I don’t see it as being a good thing for the Ticos or for foreigners who have invested in property here.
Comment by Writer — March 22, 2008 @ 9:20 am