Pages
Categories
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
Meta
Autor: rod
~ 27/06/08
by Rod Hughes
Like most Western nations including the United States, Costa Rica is wrestling with the effects of high petroleum prices and is divided on how to keep them from impacting the economy negatively. The Arias administration thought the government could best improve the nation’s balance of trade while controling inflation by taking the tax off diesel and adding it to gasoline sales. But that plan is now meeting a chorus of protest.
The latest to oppose the idea is a flipflop by the Citizen Action Party (PAC) bloc in the Legislative Assembly which initially thought it might be a good idea. But now they have backed away from the idea after having a look at the way the bill was drafted. PAC now plans to use its usual tactic of drowning the measure in an avalance of amendments. Even new PAC defector Andrea Moirales, now an independent and an opponent of using such blocking tactics, says she has her doubts that this is the way to confront the energy crisis.
Like most countries, Costa Rican stores receive their products by truck and the idea of reducing the price of diesel is to help retailers refrain from hiking the prices of their merchandise. Also, adding to the price of gasoline would stop the increasing use of that fuel, consumption of which has risen this year despite high prices at the pump. Bus transport, a big factor in this country, would also be effected and keeping the price low to passengers would encourage many to leave their cars at home and ride to work on public transport. One such government plan is now in effect, but that one does not need Legislative Assembly approval.
One sticking point is that the bill would increase the price of regular and premium gasoline for cars but leave jet fuel and bunker alone. But PAC deputy Ronald SolĂs groused, “Why should Tico motorists subsidize the big airlines?” “Now (that we see the bill) we realize that things are not what we hoped,” he explained to the daily La Nacion.
Despite a special plea by Minister of the Presidency Rodrigo Arias to speed up passage of the energy bill, it appears it is an orphan lacking support among the opposition parties. One National Liberation party legislator told La Nacion that the administration’s lawmakers would call the chiefs of the various blocs together to see if a compromise can be hammered out.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This is funny because up until last year diesel already was 30% cheaper than gasoline, due to a traditional subsidy in order to benefit farmers and transportation. Our fearless leader eliminated that subsidy over the past year, so that driver’s of diesel powered luxury SUVs would not be subsidized by poor “piratas” driving Hyundai Elantras.
Now everyone is crying because he wants to make a law to effectively re-subsidize diesel? And why is he going to the Legislature in the first place when he was the one who eliminated the subsidy?
But in the end it often works out for the best that our congress is totally incompetent. In this case having companies look for ways to cut rising fuel costs (bio-diesel anyone?) should work out well in the long run.
Comment by Writer — June 28, 2008 @ 5:35 pm
Apparently, subsidies can be placed or eliminated by decree but the actual tax is a budgetary measure and congress controls the purse strings. Still, you’ve got to admit that Arias has done more than Bush and the U.S. Congress to confront OPEC’s gouging of petroleum consimers.
Comment by rod — July 7, 2008 @ 12:31 pm