Pages
- About the Content
- About Us
- Costa Rica Property Law – Squatter’s vs. Landowner’s Rights
- RSS Costa Rica Real Estate
Categories
Archives
- July 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
Meta
Autor: rod
~ 14/11/08
by Rod Hughes
A bill to pardon hardship cases of those who contracted public housing but have fallen far behind in their payments has passed its first reading in the the Legislative Assembly. The current law stipulates that those who do not pay back the extremely soft loans of public housing within 20 years will face foreclosure and, indeed, some legal processes are already in court.
In the 1980s, the Banhvi housing bank was created and Costa Rica, faced with a housing shortage and a population of workers who could not muster the down payments to own their own homes, began an ambitious public housing program that has continued into the present time. The presentation of housing “bonds” became a nearly monthly ceremony.
Many of the original mortgage contractors have disappeared but the debts incurred to BANHVI have lived on. At least 2,100 families were in danger of losing their shelter. Some, who had contracted their homes with such now defunct entities such as Banco Anglo or Mutual Guanacaste, had not idea whom to pay. Others suffered hard luck, such as incapacity of the breadwinner.
In many cases, the legal costs of foreclosure would be larger than anything the bank could recoup. The original debts were incurred in inflation-eroded colones and the tiny houses themselves are in most cases sadly deteriorated. The 35 votes for the bill underscores the general approval the lawmakers felt.