Pages
Categories
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
Meta
Autor: rod
~ 01/07/08
by Rod Hughes
The daily newspaper Al Dia reported today that only 3% of the 2,476 complaints of domestic violence resulted in prosecution during the first quarter of this year, a revelation that is certain to have political reverberations across party lines. Court figures show only 70 cases resulted in penalties for the aggressors and in 33 cases the court urged reconciliation.
The rest of the cases were dismissed. Costa Rica enacted a tough “Violence Against Women Law” just last year as the relatively high percentage of women lawmakers flexed their political muscles. Unlike many Latin American nations, Costa Ricans set aside the traditional machism of the male population in the wake of an alarming increase in murders of women by their domestic partners. The women’s liberation movement is surprisingly strong here.
But the figures may indicate that the courts have not got the message right. Jeannette Carrillo, head of the National Women’s Institute, shared her worry with the newspaper over the figures, noting that, despite a tougher law, the numbers are nearly exact duplicates of the 2007 data for the courts. Very likely, the nation’s Ombudsman’s Office (called the Defender of the Citizen Office) will weigh in on the subject. It is headed by a woman.
No Comments »
No comments yet.
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: post_comments_feed_link() in /home/rmartin/public_html/blogs/wp-content/themes/black-and-red-theme/comments.php on line 30